Navigating total return strategies in Trump 2.0 (2025)

It has been a challenging year, to say the least, for multi asset portfolio managers. The US government’s policy announcements and backpedaling have reduced the ability to forecast the future with any decent conviction, and volatility and shifts in correlation and market leadership across all asset classes have driven investors to rethink their strategic asset allocations as well as risk management approaches.

More than ever, it has been important for absolute return fund managers to approach investing with a level head and not react to headline news and policy announcements that are then retracted a few days later. Long-only investors have also had to rethink the time horizon of their investments, as fundamental views may be eclipsed by news flow or market narrative and sentiment. In this article, we discuss the key pillars of Eastspring Multi Asset team’s investment approach in this Trump 2.0 era.

No single approach to alpha is working this year

During normal economic and market cycles, following a data-driven approach is helpful to separate trend from noise. With a large amount of data thrown at global investors daily, the team relies on a proprietary model that uses 10,000 data points to distill macroeconomic changes and systematically identify alpha opportunities. But that has changed somewhat since the start of Trump 2.0. Short-term alpha opportunities are now driven less by historical data and its implications on where we are in the economic cycle, and more by policy action and its implications.

We have seen that investors have begun to discount high frequency data as being stale and are focused on policy announcements instead. Even if macroeconomic data shows that US consumers continue to look strong, unemployment rate is low, and corporates are beating earnings estimates, risk assets are unfazed by it. They are focused not on past data, but on the impact of policy on future data. The market’s reaction to this year’s January 10^th non-farm payrolls upside surprise drove yields 17 basis points higher, but on April 4^th, a strong jobs data print had no impact to 10-year Treasury yields.

We believe that our multi-strategy approach that utilises various investment philosophies and implementation tools – systematic, fundamental, carry and convexity– therefore has the potential to strengthen and position portfolios for the uncertainty that is here to stay.

In particular, the market volatility presents itself several market dislocations that can be taken advantage of using options – what our convexity alpha pillar aims to do. While option prices have spiked significantly, derivative trades allow you to express your view while keeping downside capped. This convexity profile is attractive for total return portfolios, as they enable you to skew the risk/reward in your favour.

For instance, if the investment view is bullish equities, holding an outright overweight position in equities runs the risk of being significantly hit in case the US administration does not reach a deal with key trading partners, or the reciprocal tariffs are back. Instead of having an outright overweight position in equities, portfolios can use structures such as calls, call spreads, call ratios, and risk reversals to express the view in a more risk-aware manner.

Another example is when the volatility curve suggests a very low probability of a certain outcome occurring, versus what we forecast. Rapid movements in the spot market can sometimes present opportunities, enabling you to benefit from a convergence to mean with limited downside risk.

Prioritising risk management over seeking alpha is essential

Due to the unpredictable nature of the Trump administration's policies, even with sound asset allocation decisions, neglecting beta positions in total return portfolios can be risky. This year, prioritising risk management over seeking alpha is essential. The right risk management framework not only protects returns but also puts you on front foot to take risk and generate alpha when the opportunity arises.

In early March, several technical indicators, which have historically been reliable, were suggestive of a tactical bounce in the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust and were indicating it was in oversold territory. Even going into Liberation Day, indicators were suggesting that a lot of the bad news was in the price and therefore a bounce was likely. Despite that, we saw a significant leg lower in a short span of time, leaving investors with very little reaction window.

We expect this nature of environment to continue as US’ economic outlook remains hinged on economic policy announcements. We therefore prefer to hold hedges in the portfolio systematically through the market cycle, as timing risk-off episodes is going to be incredibly difficult. Being proactive risk managers increases the probability of meeting the end client’s target return over a 1–3-year period as we know from experience that recovering from a large drawdown is challenging for total return funds.

Using data from 2001, a 60/40 balanced portfolio has on average taken 24 months to recover its peak to trough drawdown. See Fig 1. While systematic risk management may imply a cost of carry, it will allow total return portfolios to cushion the absolute drawdown during significant risk-off episodes.

Equally important are the risk models that the scenario profit and losses are based on. This year, equity/bond correlations turned negative, after being positive since July 2022. Risk models that have a lookback window of 2 years will give a very different portfolio risk profile, than those that use 20 years of data. See Fig 2. This complicates risk management as you are not only solving for the portfolio positions, but also the correlation matrix. It therefore becomes critical to assess portfolios across different assumptions, time periods, and ensure the resulting numbers are within the risk tolerance levels.

Banking wins amid intense market shifts

As US growth and the Fed rate cut projections are still in flux and very dependent on unpredictable policymakers, long-only managers need to make a big mindset shift, balancing their buy and hold strategy with one that is more actively traded. Managers need to embrace the volatility and hold little conviction in any fundamental views for a long period of time as they can be upended by policies overnight. Banking your wins is important in this jarring environment. Securing profits when they arise helps mitigate the risks associated with sudden market downturns and helps maintain a portfolio’s long-term financial stability, allowing it to better navigate economic uncertainties.

Our recent long position in China shares is one such example. As we noticed the shift in policymakers’ intention to take economic growth in China higher, we entered long China against the US. The trade moved quickly in our favour, but then positioning and technical indicators began to look stretched. Therefore, it was necessary to bank the wins and continuously manage the profit and loss, in case any policy announcements would change the fundamental picture substantially. At the time, it was the right thing to do, as market volatility meant that all of those gains would have otherwise been erased only 13 days later.

The CBOE volatility index started the year at a fairly benign level of 16 but surged to its third highest point since the late 1990s. As Trump 2.0 is primed to be exciting, volatile, and difficult for asset allocators, the team will be relying on three pillars to navigate the current market environment: adopting multi-strategy alpha opportunities, prioritising systematic risk management, and banking wins as they arise.